Who is this programme for?
Expert assessors and suitably qualified specialists who evaluate management system or process evidence as part of a technical opinion.
Curriculum & Assessment Programme
Turn audit evidence into a defensible technical evaluation: distinguish criteria, case records, sampling and conclusions, and make the limits of an opinion explicit.

Expert assessors and suitably qualified specialists who evaluate management system or process evidence as part of a technical opinion.
Experience in the candidate’s own expert field and foundations in audit methodology. The add-on builds on a relevant auditor profile or equivalent experience and does not replace subject-specific expert education. Prior knowledge, case type and intended depth of assessment are documented before booking.
An add-on with individually agreed scope. Teaching, supervised casework and the assessment below are specified in a written timetable before booking. The 24 teaching units of an auditor foundation profile do not automatically apply to this add-on.
Live online through alfaview or in person, with learning materials and assessment information in the Odoo portal. One teaching unit (UE) is 45 minutes; breaks are excluded. The timetable, teaching and assessment languages and any individual oral assessment slots are confirmed before the course begins.
Distinguish the audit assignment, expert question and legal judgement; state criteria, scope, assumptions and limitations.
Scope / allocation
As agreed before booking
Evidence and output
An assignment and criteria matrix.
Examine provenance, completeness, timing, inconsistencies and missing material systematically.
Scope / allocation
As agreed before booking
Evidence and output
A sources and evidence matrix.
Separate observations, third-party statements, technical evaluation and conclusions; consider alternative hypotheses and uncertainty.
Scope / allocation
As agreed before booking
Evidence and output
A reasoned technical statement.
Answer critical questions, explain limitations and justify requests for further evidence or investigation.
Scope / allocation
As agreed before booking
Evidence and output
An oral defence of the case report.
Weighting: 70 %
Turn a bounded fictional case file into an assignment matrix, evidence matrix and short reasoned statement.
90 minutes
Weighting: 30 %
Explain the evaluation and answer critical questions about sources, alternatives and limitations.
30 minutes
A pass requires at least 70 of 100 weighted overall points and at least 60 of 100 points in every mandatory assessment component. In the practical component, the critical criterion “link between requirements and evidence” must achieve at least 2 of 4 rubric points. These thresholds are Academy policy; ISO/IEC 17024 does not prescribe these scores.
Practical performance is scored against each published criterion from 0 to 4: 0 = absent or unusable; 1 = substantial technical gaps; 2 = usable work with identifiable gaps; 3 = traceable and technically sound; 4 = complete, precise and critically justified. Criteria within a component are weighted equally unless a different published allocation is stated in the task. Component scores are converted to a percentage.
Link between requirements and evidence
Permitted aids are the standard edition named in the assessment plan, personal course notes, the supplied case materials and a basic calculator. Communication with third parties, generative AI, automated answer services and unapproved internet research are not permitted during assessed components. Word processing is permitted for case dossiers; accessibility aids are agreed beforehand.
Before assessment, identity is checked against an official photo ID. For live online assessment, access, supervision, permitted aids and technical contingency arrangements are explained beforehand. This does not automatically require retaining an ID copy or recording the assessment.
The common assessment rules also cover retakes, reasonable adjustments, appeals, confidentiality and certificate authorisation.
Assessment and Certificate RulesAcademy add-on certificate: Audit Competence for Expert Assessors
This programme applies to deliveries whose agreed course and assessment plan explicitly references this revision. Existing bookings retain their agreed terms.
No. It is a subject-related add-on for audit and evidence evaluation. Foundational qualifications and experience in the relevant expert field remain necessary.
No. Its scope is agreed separately before booking. The three-day internal auditor course and this add-on are distinct.
No. Assessment uses a fictional or sufficiently anonymised case. Confidential files are considered only where their use is lawful and expressly agreed.
You receive feedback on the assessed competency areas. Failed components may be retaken under the common assessment rules using equivalent new tasks. Dates, any preparation required and any fees are communicated beforehand.
It records a passed course assessment with stated competencies, scope and programme version. It is not accredited personnel certification and does not replace professional experience or an assignment-specific suitability assessment.
Solo self-employed in Germany? Discuss potential KOMPASS support with an official advisory centre before booking. We can help you select a suitable programme in a consultation.
An Academy-owned assessed competence credential. The assessment programme refers to selected principles of ISO/IEC 17024:2026. This is not a claim of accreditation or fully demonstrated conformity.